Close

Likes Likes:  33
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #5
    Senior Trustee
    Sergeant
    Socialism_is_terrorism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    2,793
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by IseDaDiva View Post
    130lbs. Just those two mighty ass cheeks weigh that much.

    Maybe they need to install livestock scales in airports frequented by massive buffarillas.
    True! Strange enough that oversized buffarillas are still allowed to fly, I mean, double the size, double the CO2, isn't it ?

    Edit: I did a little bit of research, and look what I came up with. It's gorgeous, according to The Environmental Foodprint of Obesity:
    We used data on GHG emissions from various sources and estimated that obesity is associated with ~20% greater GHG emissions compared with the normal-weight state. On a global scale, obesity contributes to an extra GHG emissions of ~49 megatons per year of CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) from oxidative metabolism due to greater metabolic demands, ~361 megatons per year of CO2eq from food production processes due to increased food intake, and ~290 megatons per year of CO2eq from automobile and air transportation due to greater body weight. Therefore, the total impact of obesity may be extra emissions of ~700 megatons per year of CO2eq, which is about 1.6% of worldwide GHG emissions.
    Solution: We need more batwings!
    Last edited by Socialism_is_terrorism; 05-23-2023 at 06:51 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •