Close

Likes Likes:  56
Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Trustee
    Senior Corrections Officer
    Kagman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2022
    Location
    America
    Posts
    1,896
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Socialism_is_terrorism View Post
    Thanks for the explanation / insight! How is that working in the US on a federal level (are there federal prosecutors, or does the local attorney general have to pass a case forward)? Does that mean it will be possible to e.g. override a aquittal in Florida (e.g. a self defence case against a nigger) on federal level?

    For the relatively few number of cases that can be tried in both Federal and Local courts, the two negotiate with the Feds generally acquiescing and allowing the case to be heard locally. Note however, that there would be no 'double jeopardy' here as the Federal case focused on the denying of a prisoner of her civil rights and NOT rape. If the case had been heard locally and it most assuredly COULD have been heard locally even with the Federal charges, the local charges would have been rape and child abuse. Since there are no local laws regarding the denial of Civil Rights, there was no conflict.. The Feds just did as they damn well pleased (and, in this case, good for them) Why did the Feds chose to act in this specific case? This punk-assed kiddie rapist was the nephew of a sitting Governor.. and a grossly corrupt one at that. No way that punk ass would have seen a second in prison had the case been heard locally. Even so, the rapist was kept on the local payroll until the very day of his conviction.

    As to your question - If there is an acquittal at any level in the judicial system, those specific charges CANNOT be retried at any level - Federal or Local. What can be done, as mentioned, is OTHER charges can be considered that arose from that crime. Specifically, the denial of Federally guaranteed 'Civil Rights'.. In this case, the right not getting your ass raped by some connected prison guard - yes, in Fed-Speak, not getting raped in prison is a civil right. These are called 'Color of Law' prosecutions... So what happens to avoid 'double Jeopardy' is your NOT tried on charges of rape, rather, the denial of civil rights...

    Hope that answered your question

  2. Likes Tar Remover liked this post
  3. #2
    Chimpout Member
    Corrections Officer
    Defund Welfare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Rust Belt
    Posts
    512
    Post Thanks / Like
    They can ban whatever they want, it takes less than a year for niggers to kill more niggers than 80 years of actual lynching now.
    Wherever you find failure, you will find niggers. From the slums, to the unemployment line, to prison, to homeless shelters. And where ever you find niggers, you will find failure. IE Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore, Memphis, Cleveland, Haiti, and Africa. These are facts.

  4. Likes Tar Remover, IseDaDiva liked this post
  5. #3
    Senior Trustee
    Captain
    tweakstick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    5,877
    Post Thanks / Like
    ^Most people will remember that the police that gave Rodney Kang his duly earned Maglite and nightstick corrections were acquitted by the state courts only to be charged by the Feds Justice Department under Bush 41's direct orders.

    The only explanation is that our government hates white cops.
    tweakstick \ˈtwēkˈstik\ 1: A small plastic calibration tool, used for making adjustments on electrical or mechanical equipment. 2: A large wooden calibration tool, used for making adjustments on antiquated farm equipment.

  6. Likes Tar Remover, Kagman, IseDaDiva liked this post
  7. #4
    Chimpout Member
    Corrections Officer

    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    914
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by tweakstick View Post
    ^Most people will remember that the police that gave Rodney Kang his duly earned Maglite and nightstick corrections were acquitted by the state courts only to be charged by the Feds Justice Department under Bush 41's direct orders.

    The only explanation is that our government hates white cops.
    Says Rush, the bill's sponsor: “Lynching is just covered in a different camouflage. The rope has been replaced with a shotgun and semi-automatic weapons."
    Some examples of what could fall under that definition:
    —The 2020 slaying of Ahmaud Arbery in Glynn County, Georgia, in which the 25-year-old was jogging when he was followed by three white men in pickup trucks and killed. A federal jury recently determined that incident was motivated by racial hatred.
    —The 2015 fatal shootings of the Black pastor and eight other Black congregants at Emmanuel A.M.E. Church in Charleston, South Carolina, by Dylann Roof.
    —In 1998, James Byrd, Jr., a Black man, was dragged to his death behind a pickup truck near Jasper, Texas, by white men. An avowed racist was executed in 2019 for Byrd's killing. John William King had a tattoo on his body of a Black man with a noose around his neck hanging from a tree, according to authorities. Here is what I found. Yes. They are defining it broadly. It is an f.u. to whites basically. I'd watch it dealing with any non white.
    AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File




  8. #5
    Senior Trustee
    Sergeant
    Socialism_is_terrorism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    2,695
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Kagman View Post

    Hope that answered your question
    It did, thank you very much for your effort! I am always surprised how different law in the US is compared to (most) EU countries.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •