India's new citizenship law excludes Muslims

[Whitey Ford]

India's new citizenship law excludes Muslims. Here's what to know

India has implemented a citizenship law that excludes migrants who are Muslims, a minority community whose concerns have heightened under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist government.

The law establishes a religious test for migrants from every major South Asian faith other than Islam. Critics argue that the law is further evidence that Modi’s government is trying to reshape the country into a Hindu state and marginalize Muslims.

The Citizenship Amendment Act provides a fast track to naturalization for Hindus, Parsis, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains and Christians who fled to Hindu-majority India from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan before Dec. 31, 2014. The law excludes Muslims, who are a majority in all three nations.

The law was approved by Parliament in 2019, but Modi’s government held off its implementation after deadly protests against the legislation in which scores were killed.

The nationwide protests drew people of all faiths who said the law undermines India’s foundation as a secular nation. Muslims were particularly worried that the government could use the law, combined with a proposed citizenship registry, to marginalize them.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...72c924c6&ei=20

[Ignatow]

A country has the right of self-determination. They can say there's no separation of church/Hindu temple and state, it's not my problem. But this shows how smart Indians are: that they don't like Muslims to putrefy their country.

Racist, segregationist, whatever. That's very smart indeed.

[Whitey Ford]

A country has the right of self-determination. They can say there's no separation of church/Hindu temple and state, it's not my problem. But this shows how smart Indians are: that they don't like Muslims to putrefy their country.

Racist, segregationist, whatever. That's very smart indeed.

I was wondering when the Hindus would finally have had enough with the mudslimes. The Buddhists were even fighting back against those idealogical shitstains.

SIT KWIN, Myanmar (Reuters) - The Muslims of Sit Kwin were always a small group who numbered no more than 100 of the village's 2,000 people. But as sectarian violence led by Buddhist mobs spreads across central Myanmar, they and many other Muslims are disappearing.
Their homes, shops and mosques destroyed, some end up in refugee camps or hide in the homes of friends or relatives. Dozens have been killed.

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSDEE92S04U/

Of all the moral precepts instilled in Buddhist monks the promise not to kill comes first, and the principle of non-violence is arguably more central to Buddhism than any other major religion. So why have monks been using hate speech against Muslims and joining mobs that have left dozens dead?

This is happening in two countries separated by well over 1,000 miles of Indian Ocean - Burma and Sri Lanka. It is puzzling because neither country is facing an Islamist militant threat. Muslims in both places are a generally peaceable and small minority.

In Sri Lanka, the issue of halal slaughter has been a flashpoint. Led by monks, members of the Bodu Bala Sena - the Buddhist Brigade - hold rallies, call for direct action and the boycotting of Muslim businesses, and rail against the size of Muslim families.

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-22356306

Muslimes are like a cancer. A few host cells emerge and seek to spread across the rest of the body whole. Until the cancer is destroyed entirely and regularly checked to make sure it never comes back, there will never be any peace.

[haywood]

India's new citizenship law excludes Muslims. Here's what to know










https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...72c924c6&ei=20

I guess after nearly 1100 years of being INVADED by @$$ lifter$ Indians learned their lesson!! Here is a typical EXAMPLE of LEFIST HYPOCRISY, the UN condemns Israel saying that it commits "genocide" against "palestinians". How can you commit genocide against a people who NEVER existed. I mentioned the story about Hadrian in a few previous posts. Where there WAS genocide was in India, and it was committed by mudslime arabs. They slaughtered 10s of thousands of Indians over a MILLENIUM!! Then they created the "states" of pakistan and bangla desh from STOLEN Indian land. Why doesn't the un go after them for "occupying" territory?! I am so SICK of GLOBALISTS and leftists, but i am being REDUNDANT here. Anyway, good for India to pass laws based on COMMON SENSE!!