After the Oscars ratings fiasco, NBC won't air the Golden Globes, with the excuse things aren't diverse enough

[Sandy]

NBC will not air the Golden Globes in 2022, the network said in a statement on Monday morning. This means the Hollywood Foreign Press Association will now have to decide how or if it will move forward next year without its broadcast partner, or more swiftly enact changes demanded by industry leaders regarding the org’s membership and processes.

“We continue to believe that the HFPA is committed to meaningful reform,” NBC said in a statement. “However, change of this magnitude takes time and work, and we feel strongly that the HFPA needs time to do it right. As such, NBC will not air the 2022 Golden Globes. Assuming the organization executes on its plan, we are hopeful we will be in a position to air the show in January 2023.”

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...183520786.html

Golden Globes? After the Oscars had the lowest ratings ever? NBC would have better luck airing a live broadcast of paint drying.

[GeneralPat]

Who even watches the oscars anyway? One fucking nigger decided to make an acceptance speech to the black panthers. Since it's a filthy nigger talking about HIS hateful group of color on TV, that is fine. That probably explains the low ratings, more forced "diversity" shit on TV.

[IseDaDiva]

That time that Tom Cruise sent his @goldenglobes
for “Jerry Maguire,” “Magnolia” and “Born on the Fourth of July” in an actual box to the reception desk of HFPA to stand against their sexist, homophobic, racist practices of exclusion, harassment and bias.

So moviemakers, writers, etc. have to insert heroic niggers, gays, women, and trannies into all their movies, even if it makes zero sense? What if it's a true story that was nigger-free? Oh, silly question. They'll just make one of the real YT people into a nigger as they did in the Judy Garland biographical film. Will authors also have to put "diverse" characters in their books if they hope to make sales?

So the humans who do all the creating are forced to let niggers, who create and produce nothing, freeload on their talent, creativity, and effort.

[Sandy]

They'll just make one of the real YT people into a nigger as they did in the Judy Garland biographical film.

I already wasn't going to see it, but now, forget it. I'll watch "The Wizard of Oz" as one of the great family-friendly movies that's nigger free.



The Academy already requires "diversity" before a movie can get nominated, as if they already didn't slobber over movies about DL niggers.

[IseDaDiva]

I already wasn't going to see it, but now, forget it. I'll watch "The Wizard of Oz" as one of the great family-friendly movies that's nigger free.



The Academy already requires "diversity" before a movie can get nominated, as if they already didn't slobber over movies about DL niggers.

I wanted to see the movie "Judy" as well, as it seems Rene Zellwegger did an amazing job, but when I saw the libtards had the unbelievable gall to turn orchestra leader Burt Rhodes into a nigger, I said "no thanks." How can they even do this? Can they make a movie about Nat King Cole or Muhammad Ali with white actors portraying them, and if not - why not? Does this "colour blindness" apply only to appropriating YT culture and artistry?

Burt Rhodes:


Nigger ass-kisser version of Burt Rhodes:


Really??