Close

Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Administrator
    LT. Colonel
    Sandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    10,443
    Post Thanks / Like

    Sows ordered evicted after illegal squatting, immediately ook they'll refuse to comply

    Wow, California judges ruled against them?

    Sam Singer, a spokesman for Wedgewood, the real estate firm that owns the home, said the company "takes no pleasure in having the sheriff enforce the court's order to evict the squatters," adding that "we urge the squatters to leave voluntarily and peacefully."

    "These squatters, as heartfelt as they are, are taking something from someone else, and that goes against the very grain of our society and civilization," Singer said. "Wedgewood has said publicly that it sympathizes with the squatters who broke in, but it doesn't condone the theft of property."

    Moms 4 Housing sounded a defiant note after the court ruling, tweeting that "the moms, and the community behind them, will not leave the property."

    Dominique Walker, one of the moms in the home, said Friday that she intends to stay despite the court's decision. "Today is not a defeat – it's the beginning of a movement," she said during a press conference held on the walkway of the home, flanked by the other women. "We never thought we'd win in an unjust system. We're up against corporations who are willing to put mothers out on the street."
    https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/01/...-oakland-home/

    Actually, niggers, we don't want you on the streets either. We want you gone from our country.

    OAKLAND — After a judge ruled Friday that she has no right to stay in the home she’s been squatting in since November, Dominique Walker of activist group Moms 4 Housing said the sheriff’s office is going to have to arrest her to get her out.

    “We are here. And we’re not leaving,” Walker, founder of the group calling attention to the city’s homeless crisis, said to the cheers of supporters gathered outside the house on Magnolia Street in West Oakland.

    Dealing a blow to the movement built by Walker and several other homeless mothers, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Patrick McKinney rejected Walker’s argument that she should be allowed to stay in the house because “housing is a human right” and she has nowhere else to go. The women, who moved into the empty, investor-owned West Oakland house Nov. 18 without the owner’s permission, argue speculators shouldn’t be allowed to hold vacant property while there are thousands of homeless residents in the city.

    Wedgewood, the real estate investment company that owns the property, applauded the judge’s ruling in a case that has drawn national attention. The one-page order authorizes the sheriff’s office to evict the women within five days. The group previously has declined to say how many people are living in the home.
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/moms-4-...ners-disagree/

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EBT-L-MOMS-0111-4.jpg 
Views:	81 
Size:	157.9 KB 
ID:	10626

    So there by the niggers' own admission, they have no right to stay in the home. Human rights do not apply to them, and guess what, there's no "right to housing" anyway. There's no right to taking over property that belongs to someone else, and it's tactics like this that turn a half-ruined neighborhood into completely ruined. We all know that house will now need to be razed to the ground after being turned into a crack den.

    God, I'd love to be a fly on the wall if they resist against a bunch of human deputies.
    We know the world is messed up when a Kenya-born Muslim returns as President, Snowden fled to HK and Russia to escape the U.S. govt, George Zimmerman was put on trial, Colin Kapernick was GQ's Citizen of the Year, Dems steal a presidential election, and BLM is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

  2. #2
    Senior Trustee
    Captain
    Bottle_of_Hate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,685
    Post Thanks / Like
    Niggers think everything is a right. Next they will steal luxury vehicles and say it is ok because not everyone has a car. If this had been an individual owner they would have been screwed.

    A nigger will actually believe these things. Not just say them because liberals will side with them. Which is another problem. How can anyone think it is ok to just steal a house? If it were their own homes would they be as willing to fight for the “right” of the niggers to live free on their dime?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    Give humans a pile of bricks and they will build you a city. Give niggers a city and they will build you a pile of bricks.

    Appeasement is feeding the beast, hoping it will eat you last.

  3. #3
    Senior Trustee
    Captain
    tweakstick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    5,877
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Sandman View Post
    Wow, California judges ruled against them?
    It could have been much worse.

    I have read numerous horror stories about squatters. One of the worst was a human family that took an extended European vacation to visit family for about a month. Upon return, they found their home stolen from under their feet by a pack of feral dune coons. They broke in as soon as the humans left for the airport, immediately changed the locks, threw out all their belongings complete with family heirlooms, pics etc. Then they forged a lease. They took the lease to the utility companies and had the bills changed over to their names. They then painted the house to show improvements on the property and promptly went to the court to declare that the owners had abandoned the property and get the title changed over to them. These were the only things they needed to do to leave an American human family homeless and cost them their entire life savings in legal bills trying to regain their property.

    The courts and the sheriff knew what was going on but were powerless to stop them under the laws.

    The damnedest thing is that if the family had missed the flight and still been home, they could have shot them dead as home invaders and only been out the cost of a few shells and some carpet cleanup.

  4. #4
    Chimpout Member
    Corrections Officer
    BigJigger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    162
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by tweakstick View Post
    It could have been much worse.

    I have read numerous horror stories about squatters. One of the worst was a human family that took an extended European vacation to visit family for about a month. Upon return, they found their home stolen from under their feet by a pack of feral dune coons. They broke in as soon as the humans left for the airport, immediately changed the locks, threw out all their belongings complete with family heirlooms, pics etc. Then they forged a lease. They took the lease to the utility companies and had the bills changed over to their names. They then painted the house to show improvements on the property and promptly went to the court to declare that the owners had abandoned the property and get the title changed over to them. These were the only things they needed to do to leave an American human family homeless and cost them their entire life savings in legal bills trying to regain their property.

    The courts and the sheriff knew what was going on but were powerless to stop them under the laws.

    The damnedest thing is that if the family had missed the flight and still been home, they could have shot them dead as home invaders and only been out the cost of a few shells and some carpet cleanup.
    OMG, that sounds way too easy to abuse and I'm surprised it doesn't happen more often.

    We have squatters rights in Australia, but it's not as easy as what you said and certainly not common.

    You have to stay on and maintain a property for 10 years and use it as a regular household and only then can you take legal ownership- of course no one is going to forget they own a property for over 10 years so you can see why it's very uncommon.

    I think its mostly over slight land disputes involving fencing and such. A few meters here and there, just makes things easier and more clear cut for the courts

    Sent from my SM-J250G using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •