This Proves Niggers Are The Creation Of The Devil

Take a look at this....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d16LNHIEJzs

I couldn't help laughing. Even photography shows nature's bias against niggers.

I noted one comment in particular....
"Even using digital, I find dark skins very hard to properly expose. Not enough light, and there is no detail, too much light and it looks weird."

The answer is very simple; niggers are not part of the natural order of things.

I'm not religious, but that doesn't mean I totally rule out a supernatural creation of the human race. If the Devil does exist, niggers were surely his creation.
If created by God, it must have been either a mistake - or boy, he really hates us! Nobody in their right mind would have chosen these creatures to inhabit our beautiful world.

Yea yea niggers, we know, film be rayciss too. The funny shit about this is, if the chemicals that accurately portray black and brown colors were left out, why didn’t some genius nigger scientist in Apefrica make film that exemplifies their “bootiful” nigger skin?

This is just like their argument with outting niggers in Disney films. “Niglets need to see themselves portrayed in these films too!” Well, there is a whole fucking continent of niggers that have failed to make these cartoons for all of eternity! Why doesn’t Apefrica have nigger princesses galore that were made by some nigger version of disney? We all know the answer. Niggers are too fucking stupid to make a damn camera, let alone film an animated movie. If we had left these fuckers alone and Apefrica was untouched, they would all still be sitting around starving with a leaf covering their muh dikk if at all. Why did we have to extract these niggers? Why oh why?

Holy hell, that's what I'd call a massively anit-White, racist nigger propaganda film! Half of it is a outright lie by the way (e.g. the part that Phillips designed cameras for niggers, or that Kodak created special films for niggers). It is of course possible to take pictures of dark objects, if one knows how to take a picture! And it always has been possible. Some of the best photographers and photography magazines came from apartheid South-Africa, and even nigger professional photographers admit that there is no such thing as a "biased" film/camera (e.g. Jade Keshia Gordon).
The problem is that EVERY journalist of today is a full blown retard. That's the problem when phones can take pictures. (Sorry for the rant, I just hate it when people even refuse to learn the basic physics behind the things they use.)
And, why on earth should WHITE people build cameras for niggers!? Isn't that cultural appropriation as well? It definitely is cultural appropriation when niggers use cameras developed by white people!

So, if somebody should be interested:
Films, as well as digital cameras sensors and human eyes have a finite dynamic range. I oversimplify now, but dynamic range means just the difference between the darkest and the lightest value the film can distinguish.
The dynamic range of a camera is measured in "aperture stops". That's because at a camera the aperture ring has steps, and every step doubles the light intake. (For that reason between the aperture steps there is a factor of sqrt(2)~1,4142: 1/1,4 1/2,0 1/2,8 1/4 ... 1/16, because the aperture usually is a circle, hence area of a circle.)
Now old films had a dynamic range of about 8 "steps", filmstrips of 5 "steps". The maximum of a print or monitor is usually about 5 steps as well. Assuming 5 aperture steps, the brightest point the film can resolve may get exposed to 2⁵=32 times the amount of light of the darkest point. Or, the other way around, the darkest spot has 1/32 ~3% of the light of the brightest spot.
The middle is 2,5 Steps, that's 5 ^ 2,5= 17,767 ~ 18%.
Usually (even indoors) there is much more light available than the film can resolve. Hence a photometer is used to measure the light of the scene, and the camera aperture&exposure are tuned to the middle of the range of the available light. Everything outside the dynamic range of the film is either 0% or 100%, meaning it can't get resolved!
Therefore the photometers in cameras usually are tuned to 18%, because that's exactly the middle of the available dynamic range! (The external photometers used by professionals can be tuned.)
This is the "18% grey card" that photographers hold into the pictures for calibration btw. Coincidently, (and purely by accident, nature, and NOT racism), green grass, and white peoples skin tone reflect approximately 18% of light as well, as every photographer knows.

Now, what happens when the dynamic range of the scene you want to take a picture of, is much bigger than what your film can show? Then you have to choose: Either on the dark side information gets lost, or on the bright side information gets lost (or both). So: You simply can not take a picture of a human & a nigger side by side outside on a sunny, bright day! Or a black cat on a snow field! That doesn't work. Plain and simple physics! Because dark skin reflects way less light than human skin. But of course you can take a picture of a piece of coal, in great detail, you just have to make sure the surrounding matches the main subject. (That by the way is a way on how you can recognize if a photographer knows what he's doing, look at the background and the colours of the clothing etc. he chooses.)
Proof: Niggpedia picture of a piece of coal.
Attachment 21069

The camera can't be racist, because it doesn't know if you take a picture of a human, a nigger, or a piece of coal!

Better explanation than I can do:
https://www.analog.cafe/r/dynamic-ra...otography-91uh
https://www.analog.cafe/r/what-is-ap...depth-of-field

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Keep Britain White

Take a look at this....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d16LNHIEJzs

I couldn't help laughing. Even photography shows nature's bias against niggers.

I noted one comment in particular....
"Even using digital, I find dark skins very hard to properly expose. Not enough light, and there is no detail, too much light and it looks weird."

The answer is very simple; niggers are not part of the natural order of things.

I'm not religious, but that doesn't mean I totally rule out a supernatural creation of the human race. If the Devil does exist, niggers were surely his creation.
If created by God, it must have been either a mistake - or boy, he really hates us! Nobody in their right mind would have chosen these creatures to inhabit our beautiful world.

---

Great minds THINK alike!!

Yes.Niggers are a direct descendant of the beast! it tells you in the Bible.
Cain slew Abel with a rock. Then he lied to God about it. So, God put a black spot (mark of the beast)on Cain’s forehead and condemned him to wander the earth alone .The spot spread and made him the 1st nigger.Cain raped human womens and thats how the nigger species was spawed.From a beast!