Cuz cameras be rayciss as hell, y'all.

[Tell it like it is]

So now some new Google phone claims that historically, cameras did not properly capture dark (nigger) skin tones. Well, apparently they fixed that, and now we can capture niggers in all their mud colored glory. Think how good lajamarcus is gonna look now when the crowd records him getting his ass beat for resisting arrest. Is there no limit to the stupidity that big tech will go to to kiss nigger ass ?

[Unregistered]

I agree. Those white liberal spineless cucks will stop at nothing to pamper niggers. Meanwhile those same cucks would never allow violent niggers in their own neighborhood. Hence gated communities. But they insist on moving niggers into ours. And about the camera issue , they are lucky that the camera lens didn't break while filming "Lil Daqwon" lol

[CoonsЯus]

So now some new Google phone claims that historically, cameras did not properly capture dark (nigger) skin tones. Well, apparently they fixed that, and now we can capture niggers in all their mud colored glory. Think how good lajamarcus is gonna look now when the crowd records him getting his ass beat for resisting arrest. Is there no limit to the stupidity that big tech will go to to kiss nigger ass ?

offending the nigger is the new mortal sin. It's akin to calling Jesus a cunt in the Vatican. The nigger must be worshipped and obeyed. It's only ever about the money. Everybody knows niggers are worthless, but if you want to keep those fat paychecks, you got to pay your liberal moral tax.

[Socialism_is_terrorism]

Well, that's nothing new! They claim for year that cameras are racist, Chimpcago and Filthadelphia even got rid of their traffic cameras because of the "racial bias". One just can't make that stuff up!
Apart from that it is simple physics that dark objects reflect less light than light coloured objects, so given every camera has a limited dynamic range you simply can't take a picture of a nigger in front of a very bright sky. You can even see that in the google commercial! And, of course, the "good" (nothing with a nigger can ever be good, of course) pictures in the ad are obviously made by professional photographers, and, most importantly, with professional lighting, while the bad ones are particularly bad "snap shots".

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/lens/sarah-lewis-racial-bias-photography.html

https://usa.streetsblog.org/2022/01/18/analysis-when-speed-cameras-are-racist/

[Unregistered]

Well, that's nothing new! They claim for year that cameras are racist, Chimpcago and Filthadelphia even got rid of their traffic cameras because of the "racial bias". One just can't make that stuff up!
Apart from that it is simple physics that dark objects reflect less light than light coloured objects, so given every camera has a limited dynamic range you simply can't take a picture of a nigger in front of a very bright sky. You can even see that in the google commercial! And, of course, the "good" (nothing with a nigger can ever be good, of course) pictures in the ad are obviously made by professional photographers, and, most importantly, with professional lighting, while the bad ones are particularly bad "snap shots".

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/lens/sarah-lewis-racial-bias-photography.html

https://usa.streetsblog.org/2022/01/18/analysis-when-speed-cameras-are-racist/

Liberals call those crime camera's racial bias. I call it, nigger commits crime on camera as usual